Issue 1, February 1997
In this first issue of THE OTHER VOICES you will find the latest news about the preparations for the alternative summit in Amsterdam in June, the campaign of the Dutch Coalition for a Different Europe, updates on the marches against unemployment and ot her international news (including reports from Ireland, Spain and Denmark), and much more. Philip Schepelmann, coordinator of Friends of the Earth-Europe's Greening the Treaty-campaign, has written an article on the Inter-Governmental Conference. Schepelm ann concludes that both environmental and social issues are losing out in the negotiations about the treaty revision and that it is time for the environmental movement and those fighting for social rights to join hands.
We hope that this newsletter will grow out to become a platform for debate and information exchange for the groups and individuals who plan to take part in the alternative summit and others who want to be kept updated. Send us your contributions before February 25th!
The Dutch Coalition has moved!
Please use the following address:
Dutch Coalition for a Different Europe,
P.O. Box 54
1000 AB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 4222712
Fax: +31 20 4223171
Email: ander.europa@xs4all.nl
WWW: http://www.snore.org/different-europe (that's were you are now)
Visitors address (please phone first):
Damrak 83,1., Amsterdam (150 metres from Central Station)
The following is a shortened version of the leading article in the new campaign newspaper of the Dutch Coalition. You can find the full translation on our WWW-page.
Two developments are decisive for the future of Europe. At the EU Summit in Dublin new deals were made about the European Monetary Union (EMU). In January 1999 the EMU will start and in 2002 we pay with one European coin. To be allowed to enter the EMU
the Member States carry out a rigid policy of cuts in public expenditure. "Market, market and more market" is the slogan. The Maastricht conditions result in the dismantling of social security and public services all over Europe. The unemployme
nt, now already more than 18 million in the EU, is growing further. The sales are on for state companies and public utilities, to make the housekeeping book fit. Those countries who do not manage cannot take part in the coregroup. In this way a Europe of
different speeds is threathening to emerge. A Europa which causes deeper divides between people and countries.
Moreover, the 15 member states are negotiating the revision of the
Maastricht Treaty. These negotiations should, according to plan, result in the Treaty of Amsterdam. This is supposed to bring more common action on foreign and security policy, as well as police and juridical cooperation. The process resembles horsetradin
g in which different - national - interests are traded off against each other. Both developments will decide the character of the European Union, and therefore the daily lives of European citizens. In a number of countries citizens have been able to expre
ss their opinion in a referendum about joining Europe. It is unacceptable that untill today there hasn't been a broad public debate in the Netherlands about the opportunities and risks of European intergration.
The question is not Europe or the Netherlands. The question is: what kind of Europe, for who and by whom?
The Dutch Coalition for a Different Europe is a colourful gathering of political parties, womens groups and environmental movements, solidarity groups for refugees and Third World, interest groups, NGOs, antimilitarist and peace groups.
"Our Europe must be a Europe that carries out a strong social and environmental policy, creates jobs, eliminates the democratic deficit, offers equal opportunities to women and men, safeguards the rule of law, is hospitable to refugees, is open to th
e East and in solidarity with the South, disarms in order to contribute to peace, and promotes sustainable development both inside and outside Europe", so the Dutch Coalition states.
The Dutch Coalition for a Different Europe will during the EU Summit, often together with others, also from abroad, organise actions and debates and follow the Dutch presidency critically. Giving a multitude of
opinions and proposals a chance to be he
ard is a main aim.
(*) Kok is Prime Minister, van Mierlo is Minister of Foreign Affairs, Schelto Patijn is Dutch chief negotiator in the IGC, and his brother is the mayor of Amsterdam.
The EU transport ministers, who were meeting for a two-day informal transport council in an hotel on the same square, are putting tremendous pressure on the Swiss government to abandon its environment friendly policy towards freight transit. From 2004 onwards, Switzerland wants all freight transits to go by rail. To achieve this goal the Swiss government wants to put environmental levies on freight trucks crossing the country. This policy results from a referendum which was held in 1994. The EU also de mands heavier trucks to be allowed to cross the Swiss Alps. Currently the maximum weight allowance is 28 tonnes. Denys Roulin from the Alpen-Initiative gave Dutch transport minister Annemarie Jorritsma a wooden toy-train in the colours of Zwitserland and the EU, as well as a petition co-signed by a number of Dutch environmental organisations.
The Dutch government is playing a central role in the pressuring of the Swiss government. The methods being used verge on blackmail: if the Swiss don't give in on the EU wishes, they risk EU refusal to sign six other agreements between the EU and Switz erland which are currently also being negotiated. Dutch transport minister Jorritsma has even gone so far as to threaten to withhold extra landing rights for Swiss Air in the Netherlands if Switzerland doesn't meet the EU demands concerning freight transi t.
After the first day af the Transport Council, Minister Jorritsma announced that the EU ministers had unanimously rejected the Swiss proposals. The environment working group of the Dutch Coalition and Alpen-Initiative have decided to continue a joint ca mpaign to save the Swiss transito-policy, which should become an example for Europe as a whole to follow. Support from other countries is crucial if we are to influence the decision making. Get in touch with the secretariate of the Dutch Coalition (Olivie r Hoedeman) if you want to get involved! There is much more background information on this issue to be found on our WWW-pages.
For information contact:
Karel Koster, Working Group Eurobomb Esdoornstraat 14, 3551 AJ Utrecht Holland.
Email: K.koster@inter.nl.net, tel: 31-30-2722594/31-30-2442122, fax: 31-30-2441783
The Other Europe was a two-day event. On Thursday December 12 a tribunal on subjects like the right to a safe and clean healthy environment, the impact of European policy on the developing world and the future of human rights in the European Union. On Friday the Other Europe Declaration was being discussed during a one day NGO Forum. The declaration lists concerns about the current European model of development and puts forward concrete proposals for inclusion in a new Treaty of the European Union.
To obtain the final version of the Declaration contact:
The Other Europe, c/o The Irish Refugee Council, 35-36 Arran Quay, Dublin 7, tel/fax +353-1-8724424 (contact person: Jacqueline Healy), e- mail: ailish@indigo.ie
The Other Europe events were concluded with a lively public debate amongst Eurosceptics and strong defenders of the European Union.
Erik Wesselius
22nd and 23rd of February, a large forum will take place in Brussels as preparation for the marches. It is meant for exchange of ideas and debates on questions concerning employment and the unemployed and the socially excluded in Europe. There will be special workshops on the alternative summit in Amsterdam.
For more information, contact the secretariate of the marches in your country or:
Marches europennes, 34 rue de la Tulipe, 1050 Brussels, tel: +32 2 511 47 33; fax: +32 2 513 02 55.
For more information and for copies of the Political Staement, contact:
Ramon Duran and Lucia Qiurones, AEDENAT, Campomanes 13-II, 28013 Madrid, Spain.
More information:
Kenneth Haar, International secretary Enhedslisten (Red Green Alliance) Tlf. +45 - 33 37 50 69, Fax. +45 - 33 37 50 70, e-mail: elkeha@ft.dk
For an environmentalist a parliamentary debate in the German Bundestag can be quite interesting. A debate took place on December 9 just a few days before the European Council in Dublin which showed how unimportant environment is in the context of Europ ean politics.
At least German Chancellor Kohl himself mentioned the environment in his speech as an example for "further central issues" of the Intergovernmental Conference. The debate in the German Bundestag showed what is important for European politicia ns. In this respect German MP's are probably not so much different from their colleagues in other European Member States.
Theo Waigel the German minister for finances could not have expressed it much better: "Maastricht is nothing more than an answer to globalisation". The scary shrinking of the European discourse to a debate on economic and monetary questions h as led to an alienation of the European people from the European idea. If national referenda on EU membership would be held today they would probably all be lost.
Actually there could not be much said against a European answer to globalisation. Europe needs to have an answer to globalisation. But this answer should reflect the humanistic tradition of Europe and the global principle of sustainability. What do mem bers of the governing parties in Germany mean by a European answer to globalisation?
According to the liberal MP Haussmann the people should be warned of a "step backwards into the green idyll". The export of German social and environmental standards into the world economy would lead to "mass unemployment and social riot s". A remarkably stupid assumption that is not even worth to be proven wrong.
Something else is remarkable. A letter from the German Chancellor Kohl of December 9. to the Prime Minister of the Republic of Ireland: "Furthermore we think it is important that the IGC recognises that the democratic character of our societies an d their common commitment to human rights should no longer have as a consequence that the right of political asylum between Member States will be effectively taken." We already know that the letter of the German Chancellor was obviously a success. Th e Council reached agreement that no political asylum should be granted among Member States.
These quotations show that not only the environmental movement but the whole civil society should be alarmed and should look very carefully whether the protection of human rights and the environment remain the same in their countries after the new Trea ty of the European Union.
The Brussels based environmental organisations are watching the IGC process very carefully. They are campaigning for "Greening the Treaty" in eleven different Member States. From all the sectors of society the environmental citizens organisat ions (ECOs) were probably one of the best prepared pressure groups by presenting their amendment to the Treaty already 18 month before the actual negotiations in the Intergovernmental Conference began. The results of the European Council in Dublin showed that in spite of the resistance of some Member States the ECO's managed at least to keep environment and sustainability on the IGC agenda. Nevertheless we already have to realise that substantial progress cannot be expected from this intergovernmental con ference. In the years of globalisation we first of all have to fight the social and environmental "roll back". There are a few good reasons why the social and the environmental movement should make a common social and environmental impact assess ment of the revised Treaty and the Union it will result in.
At the Dublin meeting the Irish "Greening the Treaty" Campaigner was invited to the Tribunal of the Coalition for Another Europe to share Friends of the Earth's views on the IGC. There should be further common action for a sustainable develop ment in a democratic Union in Amsterdam.
For information on Greening the Treaty II please contact: Philipp Schepelmann, Friends of the Earth Germany (BUND), Im Rheingarten 7, 53225 Bonn, Tel: +49 228 40097 74, Fax: +49 228 40097 40, e-mail: ph.schepelmann@oln.comlink.apc.org
Steve McGiffen
A copy of the appeal can be ordered at ELAN, email: a.b.mitzman@let.uva.nl
What we would like from you:
Your contributions should preferably be short and condensed, with contact address where people can receive more information. Send your contributions (preferably by email) before the 25th of February 1997 to:
Dutch Coalition for a Different Europe
The Other Voices
P.O. Box 54
1000 AB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Fax: +31 20 4223171
Email: ander.europa@xs4all.nl
Also financial contributions to the Dutch Coalition For a Different Europe are extremely welcome: Postbank NL 7609478, att. Platform Naar een Ander Europa, Amsterdam